I was watching The Golden Wedding — half-smiling and half-cringing at the made-for-TV matrimony — when I nearly choked during the vows.
The officiant, Susan Noles, a former contestant on The Golden Bachelor, announced to the happy couple: "Your lives, which began on separate paths, will be joined as one … You are declaring to each other: 'every experience I’m going to have, I want you to be part of …'"
What? Really, Susan?
This 72-year-old “golden” groom, Gerry Turner, and his 70-year-old bride, Theresa Nist, are supposed to merge decades of their personal friendships and their kids and individual interests and basically strap their limbs together and do a three-legged race through whatever’s left of their lives?
Is this what marriage is? Constant togetherness?
The implication of "two becoming one" is that "one" is better than two. I can see young people buying into that when they must navigate having kids and building households together. Or if they’re religious and believe the Bible’s "two become one flesh" verse. Or if they’re lonely and want a partner to fill a void.
But the reality of merging two full and fulfilling lives after 65 is not "two become one." It’s "two become three" — you, me and our stuff — all of it, our things and our people.
We’ve got baggage. Our "separate paths" are long and winding roads.
My boyfriend, Dan, is 76, and I’m 67. We both have grown children and grandchildren — plus two houses in different states. He lives in North Carolina, where I spend much of my time. My house in Florida is near three of my six daughters. I have many lifelong friends who are important to me, as is the place I grew up, Palm Beach County.