I’m a war baby (born between 1939 and 1945), a member of what author Richard Pells calls “the generation that changed America.” Nice to know!
My particular demographic is generally lumped in with the Silent Generation (1928–1945), considered “traditionalists” — and, well, quiet about it. That designation hardly describes the likes of the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan, a slew of glittery actors, filmmakers and such sports royalty as Muhammad Ali and Billie Jean King, all war babies who were, and are, anything but silent. Joining their ranks certainly beats being bashed as a boomer (1946–1964) and maligned by millennials (1981–1996) for just about everything amiss in the world.
My war baby cred is boosted by the fact that in the immediate aftermath of World War II, our family lived in war-torn Norway, my father’s homeland. When we returned to America, The New York Times misidentified my brother and me as “refugees” in a story accompanying a front-page photograph of us aboard ship. My mother was quick to reassure us, saying, “No, you’re just war babies coming home.”
Indeed, as we grew up in Minnesota, many of our classmates were the children of servicemen who had seen action in Europe or the Pacific. So, does having been spawned in the middle of a global war make us any different from kids born before or after that cataclysmic event?
Author Pells, professor of history emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin and author of War Babies: The Generation that Changed America, posits that “the war babies—not the generation of the Depression and World War II, or the baby boomers—produced the culture and the political attitudes we have all been living with ever since.”
He calls us “the champions of cultural and political renovation.”